False Statements On ATF Forms Or During Purchase Of Firearms 18 USC Section 922(a)(6)

Federal Gun Charge Attorneys in New Jersey

Federal Gun Charge Attorneys

If you’re facing a charge related to false statements on ATF forms or during the purchase of firearms under 18 USC Section 922(a)(6), the implications can be severe and long-lasting. However, with the right legal representation, you can navigate this challenging situation. The federal criminal defense lawyers at The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall have extensive experience in these cases and are ready to advocate on your behalf. Contact the lawyers at The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall today at (877) 534-7338 or online for focused representation.

In today’s world, ensuring the legality and safety of firearm purchases is crucial. The federal law has set forth specific statutes to govern these transactions, with a strict emphasis on the integrity of the information. One such statute, the false statements on ATF forms or during the purchase of firearms under 18 USC Section 922(a)(6), is designed to promote honesty and prevent illicit activities related to firearms. This piece delves deep into this specific statute to help individuals understand the implications of providing false information during the purchase of firearms.

Understanding 18 USC Section 922(a)(6)

Section 922 of the U.S. Code Title 18, under the “Unlawful acts” chapter, lays out various illegal activities associated with firearms. Particularly, 18 USC Section 922(a)(6) highlights the prohibition against making false statements in connection with the purchase of firearms or ammunition.

The law specifically makes it unlawful for any person, during the attempted acquisition or acquisition of any ammunition or firearm from a licensed or certified importer, licensed collector, licensed dealer, or licensed manufacturer, to knowingly provide any fictitious or false written or oral statement or to present any misrepresented or false identification. This is particularly crucial if such deceitful information is intended or likely to deceive the licensee regarding the legality of the sale or other disposition of the firearm or ammunition.

Penalties For Violating 18 USC Section 922(a)(6)

The consequences of violating this statute are not to be taken lightly. According to Section 924, which outlines the penalties for crimes associated with firearms, any person who knowingly violates subsection (a)(6) of section 922 shall face severe repercussions.

The penalties for making false statements on ATF forms or during firearm purchases can result in a fine, imprisonment for up to 10 years, or both.

Defenses To A False Statements On ATF Forms Or During The Purchase Of Firearms Charge

Lack Of Knowledge And IntentDefenses To A False Statements On ATF Forms in NJ

One of the core elements of the statute is that the individual must “knowingly” make a false or fictitious statement. Therefore, if an individual can prove that they were unaware that the information they gave was false or that they did not have the intent to deceive, this could serve as a defense. For instance, if someone mistakenly believed the information they gave was accurate based on the documents or evidence they had, they might argue they did not act “knowingly.”

Mistake Or Misunderstanding

A genuine mistake or misunderstanding might also serve as a defense. For instance, if the wording of a question on an ATF form was ambiguous or misleading, and an individual gave information they believed to be correct based on their understanding of the question, they might be able to argue that they did not intend to provide false information.

Identity Theft Or Fraud By Another Party

If someone else used an individual’s identity or personal information without their knowledge to purchase a firearm and made false statements in the process, the actual individual might use this as a defense. This would involve proving that another party committed identity theft or fraud, leading to the false statements on the ATF forms or during the firearm purchase.

Inaccuracies In The Charging Process

There could be situations where the charging process itself has flaws or inaccuracies. If the details of the charge do not match the actual events or if there were procedural errors during the arrest or charging process, it might be possible to challenge the validity of the charge.

Lack Of Materiality

The statute highlights that the false statement should be “intended or likely to deceive” the licensee with regard to any material fact concerning the legality of the disposition or sale of such ammunition or firearm. If the false statement or information is not material or crucial to the legality of the firearm sale or transaction, it might serve as a defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Constitutes A “False Statement”?

A false statement, as outlined in the statute, refers to any fictitious or false written or oral assertion or the presentation of any false identification with the intent to deceive a licensed firearm dealer, importer, collector, or manufacturer about the legality of a firearm or ammunition sale or disposition.

What Penalties Can Someone Face For Making False Statements On ATF Forms Or During The Purchase Of Firearms?

Under 18 USC Section 924, anyone who knowingly violates 18 USC Section 922(a)(6) can face fines as mandated by the title, be imprisoned for up to 10 years, or both.

Are There Related Federal Offenses To Making False Statements On ATF Forms Or During The Purchase Of Firearms?

Yes, there are other related federal offenses. For instance, knowingly making a false statement with respect to information required to be kept by a licensed individual under this chapter or during the application for a license or exemption is also a violation, as outlined in 18 USC Section 924(a)(1)(A).

Can Someone Be Charged If They Were Unaware That They Made A False Statement?

The statute specifies that the false statement must be made “knowingly.” Therefore, if someone can demonstrate that they genuinely believed the information they gave was accurate and had no intention to deceive, it can be a point of defense.

Are There Other Defenses Available For Those Charged Under 18 USC Section 922(a)(6)?

Yes, several defenses might be applicable, ranging from a genuine mistake or misunderstanding to coercion or duress. It’s essential to consult with an experienced attorney to explore potential defenses specific to each case.

Federal Gun Charge Attorneys

If you or someone you know is facing charges related to false statements on ATF forms or during the purchase of firearms under 18 USC Section 922(a)(6), the stakes are high, and experienced legal representation is crucial. The federal criminal defense lawyers at The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall are seasoned in representing individuals in such matters. Don’t leave your defense to chance. Get in touch with our knowledgeable attorneys who focus in federal gun law violation cases. Contact us immediately at (877) 534-7338 or online for a consultation.

To learn more about gun and weapons offenses, click here.