Federal Wire Fraud Lawyers

Federal Wire Fraud Defense Attorneys in New Jersey

Facing Wire Fraud Charges? Get In Contact With A Federal Criminal Defense Attorney

If you’ve been charged with federal wire fraud, the stakes are incredibly high. The penalties for this crime can result in significant prison time and hefty fines, not to mention the damage to your personal and professional reputation. Your future is on the line, and you need a robust defense from seasoned legal experts who understand the complexities of federal laws. The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall wire fraud defense lawyers have the expertise and experience to navigate these intricate legal challenges, providing you with the defense strategy you desperately need. Don’t leave your future to chance; take immediate action to protect your rights. Contact us today at (855) 927-0372 or reach out to us online for a free consultation. Time is of the essence, act now.

When facing charges related to fraud by wire, radio, or television, it’s crucial to understand the nuances of the law under which you might be prosecuted. 18 U.S.C. §1343 is a federal law that has serious consequences if violated, and understanding the law can be the first step in building a strong defense. In this piece, we’ll delve into what this law entails, the penalties involved in wire fraud cases, and how to navigate the complexities of the legal landscape.

What Is 18 U.S.C. §1343?

18 U.S.C. §1343 is a federal law that prohibits the use of wire, radio, or television to commit fraud. Specifically, it criminalizes the act of devising or intending to devise a scheme to defraud, or to obtain money or property through false or fraudulent pretenses. The law applies when these actions involve the transmission of writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds via wire, radio, or television for the purpose of executing such a scheme.

Key Elements Of A Wire Fraud Charge

To be convicted under 18 U.S.C. §1343, the prosecution must prove the following elements:

  • The defendant had the intent to defraud.
  • The defendant devised or intended to devise a fraudulent scheme.
  • The defendant used wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce.
  • The communication was made for the purpose of executing the fraudulent scheme.

Penalties Involved

If convicted under this statute, you can face severe penalties. The standard penalty includes a fine and/or for up to 20 years in federal prison. However, if the fraudulent act occurs in relation to a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency or affects a financial institution, the penalty increases dramatically. In such cases, a person may face a fine of up to $1,000,000 or imprisonment for up to 30 years, or both.

What To Do If Charged

If you find yourself charged under 18 U.S.C. §1343, immediate action is required. Retaining an experienced criminal defense attorney specializing in federal offenses is crucial. Your attorney can help you understand the specifics of the law, evaluate the strength of the case against you, and develop a robust defense strategy.

Defenses Under 18 U.S.C. §1343

Defenses Against Wire Fraud Charges in New Jersey Lack Of Intent To Defraud

One of the essential elements that the prosecution must prove under 18 U.S.C. §1343 is that the defendant had the intent to defraud. If you can establish that you lacked this intent, you may be able to get the charges dropped or secure an acquittal. Evidence such as correspondence, the nature of transactions, or statements that indicate a lack of fraudulent intent could be beneficial here.

Absence Of A Fraudulent Scheme

Another critical component for conviction under 18 U.S.C. §1343 is the existence of a scheme or artifice to defraud. If you can prove that there was no scheme to defraud or obtain money or property by false means, this could be a strong defense. For example, showing that all representations made were truthful or that all parties had complete and accurate information can negate the element of a scheme.

Non-Interstate Transmission

This law specifically applies to fraudulent schemes conducted via wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce. If you can demonstrate that the alleged fraudulent communication was entirely intrastate, you might have grounds for dismissal of the charges.

No Execution Of The Scheme

The statute requires that the wire, radio, or television communication be used “for the purpose of executing” the fraudulent scheme. If the communication in question did not result in the execution of the scheme, or was unrelated to the scheme, this could form the basis of a defense.

Consent Or Authorization

In some cases, you may argue that the parties involved in the transactions were fully aware of the circumstances and had given their consent. However, this defense can be risky, as consent may not absolve you from the element of fraudulent intent, depending on the specifics of the case.

Duress Or Coercion

Another defense could be that you were forced or coerced into participating in the fraudulent scheme. To use this defense successfully, you would need to provide evidence demonstrating the existence of duress or coercion.

Frequently Asked Questions About Fraud By Wire, Radio, Or Television

When facing charges under 18 U.S.C. §1343 for Fraud by Wire, Radio, or Television, a flurry of questions may come to mind. To help you navigate through this difficult time, we have compiled a list of frequently asked questions and their answers based on this specific federal statute.

What Constitutes “Wire, Radio, Or Television” Under 18 U.S.C. §1343?

Under this law, “wire, radio, or television” includes not only traditional forms like telephones and broadcast television but also modern technologies like the internet and satellite communications. Any form of electronic or digital transmission can potentially fall under this category.

What Does “Intent To Defraud” Mean?

Intent to defraud means that you must have knowingly engaged in deceptive practices with the goal of obtaining money, property, or some other benefit at someone else’s expense. This element is crucial for a conviction and could be a focal point in your defense.

What Is Considered An “Interstate Or Foreign Commerce” Transaction?

Any communication that crosses state lines or international borders falls under “interstate or foreign commerce.” This includes phone calls, emails, or any other form of communication that is sent from one state to another, or to a different country.

Are There Enhanced Penalties For Certain Types Of Fraud?

Yes, if the fraudulent act occurs in relation to a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency, or affects a financial institution, the penalties are significantly more severe. With this type of wire fraud conviction, you may face a fine of up to $1,000,000 and up to 30 years in prison.

Can I Face Both Federal And State Charges For The Same Act?

It’s possible. While 18 U.S.C. §1343 is a federal statute, many states have their own fraud laws. Depending on the facts of your case, you could be subject to both federal and state prosecution for the same act.

Do I Need A Lawyer If I’m Charged Under 18 U.S.C. §1343?

Absolutely. The complexities of federal law, along with the severe penalties for conviction, make it critical to seek experienced legal representation. An attorney can help you understand the specific charges against you, evaluate the evidence, and develop a defense strategy.

How Soon Should I Consult An Attorney?

As soon as possible. Early legal counsel can be crucial in building a defense and possibly negotiating with prosecutors before formal charges are filed.

Related Federal Offenses To 18 U.S.C. §1343

If you are under investigation or facing charges related to 18 U.S.C. §1343, understanding related federal offenses to the wire fraud statute is essential for complete legal planning. These offenses often share elements with wire fraud, and a legal strategy may have to consider these statutes if multiple charges are involved.

Mail Fraud (18 U.S.C. §1341)

Mail fraud is somewhat similar to wire fraud, but it involves the use of the United States Postal Service or other interstate mail carriers to carry out a fraudulent scheme. Much like wire fraud, this offense includes intent to defraud and the execution or intention to execute a fraudulent scheme. However, instead of using wire, radio, or television, the scheme must involve the use of the mail system.

Bank Fraud (18 U.S.C. §1344)

This statute makes it illegal to knowingly engage in a scheme or artifice to defraud a financial institution or to obtain money, assets, securities, or other property owned by or under the custody of a financial institution through false pretenses. While this law specifically targets financial institutions, it shares the fundamental element of “intent to defraud,” similar to 18 U.S.C. §1343.

Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. §1028)

Identity theft crimes involve knowingly transferring or using, without lawful authority, a means of ID of some other person while intending to commit or aid in any unlawful activity. This could be closely related to wire fraud if, for example, someone’s personal information is illegally obtained or used via wire communications as part of a broader scheme.

Securities Fraud (18 U.S.C. §1348)

This law applies to fraudulent schemes related to securities and commodities. If the wire communications used in the fraudulent activity involve the sale or purchase of securities, then this statute could come into play.

Health Care Fraud (18 U.S.C. §1347)

This law is targeted towards fraudulent healthcare schemes aimed at defrauding healthcare benefit programs. Like wire fraud, the statute criminalizes the use of false pretenses to obtain benefits or money. If the scheme involves wire communications, then charges under both 18 U.S.C. §1343 and §1347 may be possible.

Money Laundering (18 U.S.C. §1956)

Money laundering involves knowingly conducting financial transactions with proceeds generated from illegal activities, with the intent to conceal or disguise the source of the money. If wire communications are used to transfer these illicit funds, it could add an additional layer of legal complexity.

RICO (18 U.S.C. §1961-1968)

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, could come into play if the wire fraud is part of an organized criminal activity. RICO allows for the prosecution of individuals who engage in a “pattern of racketeering,” which could include multiple instances of wire fraud.

Hire A Wire Fraud Attorney Today

If you’ve been charged with federal wire fraud, the stakes are incredibly high. The penalties for this federal crime can result in significant prison time and hefty fines, not to mention the damage to your personal and professional reputation. Your future is on the line, and you need a robust defense from seasoned wire fraud defense lawyers who understand the complexities of federal laws. The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall have the expertise and experience to navigate these intricate legal challenges, providing you with the defense strategy you desperately need. Don’t leave your future to chance; take immediate action to protect your rights. Contact us today at (855) 927-0372 or reach out to us online for a free consultation. Time is of the essence, act now.

To learn more about federal criminal defense or to discuss your situation with a criminal defense lawyer, click here.